Deseret Morning News, Friday, November 17, 2006
Dixie land bill faces obstacles
End of session in D.C.
is a problem for S. Utah growth measure
By Suzanne Struglinski
Deseret Morning News
WASHINGTON — Environmentalists aren't the only
opponents to a controversial piece of public lands legislation that supporters
say balances development and conservation in fast-growing Washington County.
Time appears the biggest hurdle for the Washington
County Growth and Conservation Act of 2006 as the congressional schedule is
rapidly coming to a close. If it does not pass by the end of the session, set
for sometime in December, it would have to be reintroduced next year and take
more time to get through — which would suit the bill's opponents just
fine.
Sen. Bob Bennett, R-Utah, told the Senate Public
Lands and Forests Subcommittee on
Thursday that the bill must pass to manage the growing population in Washington County within the region's public lands
and resources. He said water developments, transmission lines and highways
cross public lands, making it hard for future development planning.
"The federal government must play a
significant and active role in securing the future and continued viability of
these areas," Bennett said. "And that is why this legislation is so
critical."
The bill would sell 24,300 acres in two phases,
Bennett said. Proceeds from the sale would fund conservation projects within Washington County. It also designates 219,725 acres
as wilderness, including some in Zion
National Park, designates
utility corridors and trails for off-highway vehicles, among other items.
"This bill has been mischaracterized
substantially," Bennett said, saying there is no need to listen to those
who want to push the bill off or not have it go through this year. "There
is nothing we will learn next year that we don't already know."
Bennett emphasized that he patterned the bill after
similar bills introduced by Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev.,
and Sen. John Ensign, R-Nev., which helped manage
land in Nevada's Clark and Lincoln counties.
"These bills show that you can strike a
successful balance between conservation measures and economic development
initiatives, while protecting both the public lands and the communities that
depend on them," Bennett told the subcommittee.
Washington County Commissioner Alan Gardner
explained how the county is growing rapidly with 1,000 new residents coming in
a month.
"It is a formidable task to try to balance the
preservation of special places, while at the same time assuring that growth
will be accommodated in a visionary manner that provides and maintains a high
quality of life," Gardner
said. "Utah
needs this bill."
He said it would "establish policies that will
allow us to develop a vision for the future, and then gives us the tools to
accomplish the various elements of that vision."
But the bill's opponents, who say the bill favors
development and sells taxpayers short, see nothing but a bleak future if the
bill would pass.
Peter Metcalf, CEO of Black Diamond Equipment and a
director of the Outdoor Industry Association in Salt Lake City, told the subcommittee that
the bill "falls short of truly protecting our public lands and balancing
the needs of the region."
The bill's proposed land sales would make
preserving open space and allowing for "close-to-home outdoor recreation
opportunities" even harder, Metcalf said. He also feels the bill leaves
out many local forests, canyons and landscapes from federal protection.
Metcalf objects to the precedent being set by
letting proceeds from the land sales going to fund local projects when it is
American taxpayer money.
Subcommittee Chairman Larry Craig, R-Idaho, said
listening to the testimony makes it sounds like they are talking about two
different bills. But he supported joining together issues that would normally
be addressed in separate bills.
Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., asked "what's
the rush?" She was concerned over the precedents the bill would set and
reminded the subcommittee that wilderness bills for Washington have gone back and forth between
the House and Senate without ever getting passed by both in the same session.
The House still needs to approve its version
introduced by Rep. Jim Matheson, D-Utah. There was a hearing in September on
the bill.
E-mail: suzanne@desnews.com
© 2006 Deseret News
Publishing Company
News 
