|
A lame law: Land act should die with the 109th Congress 11.15.06
|
A lame law: Land act should die with the 109th Congress
|
|
Tribune
Editorial
Salt Lake
Tribune
|
|
Article Last Updated:11/15/2006 07:52:50 PM MST
|
|
|
|
One of the things that should be swept out along with the
Republican-controlled 109th Congress is the Washington County Growth and
Conservation Act.
Unfortunately, this lamest of lame-duck legislative bodies
is going ahead with consideration of the bill that would force the
ill-considered sale of more than 20,000 acres of public land in the area
around St. George and Zion National Park, foolishly pre-empting the public
Vision Dixie planning process that is just getting on its feet.
A hearing on the bill, sponsored by Utah's
Republican Sen. Bob Bennett and Democratic Rep. Jim Matheson, is set for
today before the Senate's Public
Lands and Forests
Subcommittee. But that may be mere political Kabuki, because Bennett has made
no secret of the fact that he's ready, willing and able to attach the measure
to whatever after-midnight, must-pass Trojan horse appropriations bill he can
find.
His ability to do such things is one that Bennett takes
pride in. It is also one of the things that cause people to mistrust
Congress.
Bennett and Matheson want to pass the bill now because
they know that, come the changing of the guard in January, the
Democratic-controlled 110th Congress is unlikely to let the bill take even
one baby step forward.
The bill is being sold by its supporters in Congress and
in Washington County
government as a way to permanently preserve some land - although much of the
land it marks for wilderness designation is already within the protected
boundaries of Zion
National Park - while
freeing other tracts to help absorb the rapid population growth of the St.
George area.
But even St. George's
mushrooming population will take years to fill the privately owned acres
already available for development. Adding still more land to that pool, prior
to any real planning process, will encourage greater urban sprawl, the kind
that is painful anywhere but downright destructive in an area as beautiful,
arid and environmentally fragile as southwest Utah.
The more that is known about this measure, and how it
stands to enrich a handful of land developers at the expense of the true
wealth of the people's land, the worse it looks.
It is time for the people of Utah to speak out, even as they have to go
around their own misguided representatives, and warn Congress away from this
destructive land bill.
|
|